top of page

​​Most businesses are not hardwired for disruption

  • Feb 2
  • 2 min read

Businesses looking to decarbonise and offer green versions of their existing products and services, should, if at all possible not frame that work as innovation. 

Instead, businesses should make a distinction between "operational substitution", "core substitution" and "core innovation".


Bite-sizing the problem in this way (in what is probably a 70/20/10 split of time and the inverse of effort and money), gives an organisation the visibility of what might be the real innovation challenge in the last 10%, and conversely what is just a logistics job that needs to get done.


"Operational substitution" is the 70% easy bit. This can be achieved without breaking an intellectual, financial or existential sweat.


This is everything that contributes to the practical functioning of a business which can be swapped on a like for like basis for a "greener substitute" with relatively easily available alternatives; vans, loo rolls, laptops, packaging, event marketing and cloud services might fall into this bucket. 


"Core substitution" may involve a little more intellectual elbow grease - and money - but is still a matter of substituting aspects of the business's core product or service for products and services that exist. It needs to be thought about. 

There are dependencies within the opertion which distinguishes this work from "Operational substitution" but it does not involve the search for a new solution or the development of the truly novel. 


For a travel business this might be offering customers a (genuinely) green travel option and marketing the slower pace as a benefit of winding down before they arrive, or augmenting an existing "green" energy tariff (which almost certainly isn't green all the time, by ensuring electricity really is zero carbon by building on-premises solar or buying robust carbon removals to mitigate all the Scope 3 in their existing buildings and operations.


"Core innovation" is where a genuinely green, zero carbon substitute doesn't exist, and where an unknown needs to be addressed. 


In the case of a hotel, that might be answering the question of how you build a new, zero carbon site. Yet even here, much of this work will be substituted if framed correctly. 


Flights can be substituted for video calls in the planning process. Hempcrete can be poured instead of concrete. Zero carbon pools exist already. Heat pumps and data furnaces can be bought and applied for, instead of fossil fuel boilers.


The bottom line is sustainability professionals moving into a more transformative role, truly leading the transition, will need to go in with their eyes open and their leadership team aligned on precisely the kind of Innovation they are embarking on. 


CEO & Founder, Deep Green Technologies and Managing Partner, System Two


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The Great Switch: Making Clean Energy the New Normal

One of the boldest insights from our new white paper is this: The clean energy transition will stall unless we switch how we sell it. It ’s not about tech – it’s about trust, comfort, affordability an

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page